Standard I(B): Independence and Objectivity
Use reasonable care and judgment to stay independent and objective. Do not offer, ask for or accept anything of value that could reasonably be expected to compromise your own or another person's independence. Token gifts are fine, client gifts should be disclosed to your employer, and issuers should not pay your travel.
Before this: Standard I(A): Knowledge of the Law
On the exam
- Demonstrate the application of the Code of Ethics and Standards of Professional Conduct to situations involving issues of professional integrity
- Recommend practices and procedures designed to prevent violations of the Code of Ethics and Standards of Professional Conduct
- Identify conduct that conforms to the Code and Standards and conduct that violates the Code and Standards
Demonstrate I(B), recommend compliance practices and identify compliant conduct. Expect gift, travel and pressure scenarios: "violation or not?" and "which compliance practice?". The traps are "all gifts are banned" and "the visit was necessary, so the free trip is fine".
How deeply to learn each part
- Know the idea
- Understand it in general. It frames other topics, but you will not calculate with it.
- Use it
- Understand it well enough to solve a question with it. Recognize when it applies.
- Memorize
- Learn it by heart. The exam will not give it to you.
You know this one. The full lesson is folded away. The takeaways, formulas and checkpoint below are your quick refresher, and the checkpoint is a fair test of whether you still do.
You tested strong here. The full lesson is folded away. The takeaways, formulas and checkpoint below are your quick refresher, and the checkpoint is a fair test of whether you still know it.
What does Standard I(B) require?
Independence and objectivity means your analysis and recommendations reflect your own honest view, free from pressure and from anything of value that could sway you. The Standard asks you to use reasonable care and judgment to achieve and maintain that independence. You also must not offer, ask for or accept any gift, benefit, compensation or consideration that could reasonably be expected to compromise your own independence or someone else’s.
Memorize
- Keep opinions free from pressure by issuers, investment banking colleagues, clients, brokers and your own holdings.
- Do not give or take benefits that could reasonably be expected to compromise independence. The test is about what could reasonably be expected to sway judgment, not about proving it did.
- Appearances count. A lavish gift undermines trust in your work even if your view would have been the same.
Who or what can compromise independence?
The Handbook groups the risks by relationship. Know each pressure point and its response.
- Investment banking colleagues Memorize want a positive rating on a banking client
- Public companies and issuers Memorize pressure, hospitality, paid trips
- Credit rating agencies Use it the issuer pays for the rating
- Issuer-paid research Memorize fee and disclosure rules
| Situation | Verdict / best practice |
|---|---|
| Issuer offers free flights and a luxury hotel for a site visit | Pay your own way, or use commercial travel; limit issuer-paid hospitality |
| Colleagues in an investment banking relationship with a company push for a positive rating | Resist; keep firewalls between banking and research; the analyst’s view must stand |
| Issuer-paid research | Acceptable for a flat fee not tied to the conclusion, with full disclosure of the payment |
| A credit rating agency analyst is pressed by the issuer paying for the rating | Keep the rating process independent; policies shield analysts from commercial pressure |
Try this 0 of 3
- Run the gift test right first time in all three gift cases
- Spot the IV(B) twist in the client's thanks
- Rule on the paid-for research right first time
Case 1 of 5 The site visit
Hana Okafor, CFA, is a research analyst at Wexmoor Securities and covers Seltrane Energy. Seltrane invites her to a two-hour tour of its new gas terminal and offers business-class flights and four nights at a coastal resort, all paid by the company. Commercial flights to the terminal's city leave daily. Hana is due to publish an updated rating on Seltrane next month.
Step 1 of 4 The gift test
Who gives: the issuer she covers. How much: lavish. When: just before her next rating. What should Hana do?
Read the case, then answer each step. 5 cases.
How do gifts and trips work?
Think about who gives, how much, and what they want next. A token item, or ordinary entertainment, from a business contact is fine. A client’s gift after good work is less of a threat, because it rewards the past, not buys the future. Disclose it to your employer. A gift or benefit from someone who wants something later (an issuer or a broker, for example) is where independence is at risk.
Gifts and entertainment that are modest and customary are acceptable. Anything lavish, or offered just before a decision, is not. For travel funding , pay for commercial transport and a hotel yourself. Issuers should not reimburse air travel.
If a client’s gift is tied to future performance, such as a bonus linked to results, that is also a matter for IV(B) (Additional Compensation Arrangements), and you need your employer’s written consent.
Exam tip Token gift: fine. Client gift: tell your employer. Lavish gift or issuer-paid trip: decline, or pay your own way.
Compliance practices
There are three. Comply with firm policies, including a restricted list : if the firm will not publish an adverse view of a corporate client, remove the company from the research universe and release only factual information. Restrict special cost arrangements: pay your own commercial travel and hotel. Limit gifts to token items.
- Comply with firm policies Memorize including a restricted list
- Restricted list factual information only on that company
-
- Restrict special cost arrangements Memorize pay your own commercial travel and hotel; issuers should not reimburse air travel
- Limit gifts Memorize token items only
Some conflicts cannot be avoided. The Handbook points to Standard VI(A): an unavoidable conflict must be disclosed.
Go deeper Why appearances matter as much as facts
Clients cannot see inside your head. If a research analyst took a free week at an issuer’s resort and later published a favorable note, a reader would reasonably wonder whether the trip bought the view. That doubt harms the client, the firm and the profession whether or not the note was honest. So the Standard is framed in terms of what could reasonably be expected to compromise independence, not what did. This is also why the safest fix is to avoid the benefit, not to try to prove you were unaffected.
Go deeper Pressure from sales and banking, and how firewalls work
Inside a firm, the pressure on an analyst often comes from colleagues who want a rating to help a client relationship or an offering. A firewall (separate reporting lines, compensation not linked to banking revenue, and rules on who may see drafts) keeps those colleagues from steering the research. If the firm will not allow an adverse view to be published, the honest alternative to a slanted note is to stop covering the company, put it on the restricted list and publish only facts. What the analyst must not do is publish a favorable view the analyst does not hold.
Memorize this
MemorizeStandard I(B): pressure points and the right response
| Situation | Right response |
|---|---|
| Gift or entertainment | Token items only; customary business entertainment is fine if not meant to influence. Gift from a client: accept modest, disclose to employer |
| Issuer offers flights or hotel | Pay your own way: commercial transport and hotel |
| Investment banking colleagues want a positive view | Resist. Firewall, or put the company on a restricted list (factual information only) |
| Public company or issuer pressures the rating | Keep the rating unaffected by the pressure |
| Issuer-paid research | Acceptable only with full disclosure and a flat fee not tied to the conclusion |
| A conflict you cannot avoid | Disclose it under VI(A) |
Memory hook Who gives, how much, and what they want next: a token from a client is fine, a free trip from an issuer is not.
Know it cold Three compliance practices: comply with firm policies (including a restricted list), restrict special cost arrangements (pay your own commercial travel and hotel), limit gifts to token items.
- Investment banking colleagues Memorize want a positive rating on a banking client
- Public companies and issuers Memorize pressure, hospitality, paid trips
- Credit rating agencies Use it the issuer pays for the rating
- Issuer-paid research Memorize fee and disclosure rules
- Comply with firm policies Memorize including a restricted list
- Restricted list factual information only on that company
-
- Restrict special cost arrangements Memorize pay your own commercial travel and hotel; issuers should not reimburse air travel
- Limit gifts Memorize token items only
How it is asked
-
Issuer-paid trip
An analyst accepts first-class flights and a resort stay from an issuer for a two-hour site visit. Violation?
Yes, I(B). Pay your own way. Trap: "site visits are part of diligence".
-
Client gift
A client sends a modest gift after a good year. Most appropriate action?
Accept and disclose to the employer. Traps: return all gifts; keep it secret.
-
Banking pressure
The firm wants no negative views on banking clients. Which practice is most consistent?
Restricted list, factual information only. Traps: only buy or hold ratings; banking approval of research.
-
Unavoidable conflict
An analyst has a conflict of interest that bears on a recommendation and cannot be avoided. What must the analyst do?
Disclose it, as VI(A) requires. Trap: "no need, because the view is unchanged".
Exam traps
- "Any gift is a violation." Token gifts and customary entertainment are acceptable.
- Accepting issuer-paid luxury travel because the visit is necessary. Pay your own way.
- Treating a client's gift as the same as one from someone seeking future favors. A client gift is less of a threat, but still disclose it.
- Treating a performance-linked client bonus as I(B) only. It also needs your employer's written consent under IV(B).
- Fixing banking pressure by allowing only favorable ratings. Use a restricted list and publish only facts.
Checkpoint
3 exam-style questions. About 90 seconds each.
1A research analyst accepts an issuer's offer of first-class flights and three nights at a resort to attend a two-hour site visit, though commercial flights are available. Did the analyst violate the Standards?
2A client sends a portfolio manager a bottle of wine worth about USD 60 after a good year. The most appropriate action is to:
3A firm wants to stop analysts issuing negative views on companies that are investment banking clients. Which practice is most consistent with the Standards?
Key takeaways
- Keep judgment independent from issuers, bankers, clients and brokers.
- Token gifts are fine, client gifts should be disclosed to your employer, lavish issuer hospitality is not.
- Pay your own way on research trips; use restricted lists instead of slanted research.
- A conflict you cannot avoid must be disclosed under VI(A).
- Issuer-paid research needs a flat fee not tied to the conclusion, plus full disclosure.
All Ethical and Professional Standards formulas, every lesson
Practice exam-style questions on Guidance for Standard I: Professionalism
Questions about this lesson?
Where this comes back
- Standard I(C): Misrepresentation Guidance for Standard I: Professionalism
- Standard VI(A): Avoid or Disclose Conflicts Guidance for Standard VI: Conflicts of Interest
Questions candidates ask
Can a CFA member accept gifts?
Yes, within limits. Token gifts and customary business entertainment that are not meant to influence are acceptable. Gifts from clients should be disclosed to your employer. Anything that could reasonably be expected to compromise your independence or objectivity must be declined.
What is issuer-paid research and is it allowed?
It is research on a company paid for by that company. It is acceptable when the fee is flat and not tied to the conclusions, and when the payment is fully disclosed. Undisclosed payment, or fees linked to a favorable view, compromise independence.
What is a restricted list?
A list of companies on which the firm issues only factual information, not opinions. It is the recommended fix when the firm will not publish an analyst's adverse view of a corporate or banking client.
Spotted an error? Tell us and we will fix it.