Why forward and futures prices differ
Futures pay gains and losses daily, so the interest earned or paid on those flows matters. If the underlying tends to rise when rates rise, longs prefer futures and the futures price is higher; if it tends to fall when rates rise, the forward price is higher. With constant or uncorrelated rates, the prices are equal.
Before this: Futures price at inception and how daily settlement changes value, Interest rate futures: the 100 minus rate convention
On the exam
- Explain why forward and futures prices differ
Explain why forward and futures prices differ. Expect: the correlation rule and its direction, convexity bias in rate contracts, and how central clearing narrows the gap.
How deeply to learn each part
- Know the idea
- Understand it in general. It frames other topics, but you will not calculate with it.
- Use it
- Understand it well enough to solve a question with it. Recognize when it applies.
- Memorize
- Learn it by heart. The exam will not give it to you.
You know this one. The full lesson is folded away. The takeaways, formulas and checkpoint below are your quick refresher, and the checkpoint is a fair test of whether you still do.
You tested strong here. The full lesson is folded away. The takeaways, formulas and checkpoint below are your quick refresher, and the checkpoint is a fair test of whether you still know it.
When are forward and futures prices equal?
A forward and a futures contract on the same asset and date pay the same total gain or loss, but the cash arrives at different times. Futures cash arrives daily; forward cash arrives at expiry. That timing matters only if the interest rate on the daily cash changes in a way that is linked to the futures price.
The prices are therefore equal in two cases: interest rates are constant, or the futures price is uncorrelated with interest rates. The gap appears when the correlation of futures prices with interest rates is not zero.
How does correlation create a price gap?
Consider a long with positive correlation. When the futures price rises, rates also tend to be high, so the gains paid into the margin account can be invested at those high rates. When the price falls, rates tend to be low, so the losses are financed cheaply. This reinvestment of daily gains works in the long’s favor, so the long prefers the futures contract and is willing to pay more for it. The futures price is higher than the forward price.
With negative correlation the logic reverses: gains arrive when rates are low and losses when rates are high. The long prefers the forward, and the forward price is higher.
- Prices equal Memorize no gap
- Interest rates constant reinvestment rate never changes
- Futures price uncorrelated with rates gains and losses meet rates at random
-
- Futures price higher Memorize positive correlation with rates
- Gains arrive when rates are high, reinvested well
- Losses arrive when rates are low, financed cheaply
-
- Forward price higher Memorize negative correlation with rates
- Gains arrive when rates are low, reinvested poorly
- Losses arrive when rates are high, financed dearly
-
The rule of thumb: the contract that is more attractive to the buyer has the higher price. The gap grows with the volatility of interest rates and with longer maturities, but for the short maturities of most futures it is small.
Exam tip Follow the daily cash: gains that arrive when rates are high favor futures.
What is convexity bias in interest rate contracts?
Rate futures pay a fixed amount per basis point (the basis point value, or BPV), so their payoff is linear in the rate. A forward rate agreement (FRA) settles at the start of the period, with the net payment discounted at the new reference rate. Because the discount rate moves with the rate, the FRA’s payoff is slightly curved. That difference is convexity bias . It comes from the FRA’s discounting, not from the futures contract.
An FRA on a notional of 10,000,000.00 covers a 0.25-year period. The reference rate sets 50 basis points away from the FRA rate, at 3.50%. The magnitude of the cash settlement at the start of the period is closest to:
12,500.00 ÷ (1 + 0.035 × 0.25) = 12,391.57
FRA cash settlement (PV)12,391.57
- 10000000×50×0.0001×0.25=12500 (the futures payoff)
- ÷(0.035×0.25+1)=12391.57
- 10000000ENTER50×0.0001×0.25×12500 (the futures payoff)
- 0.035ENTER0.25×1+÷12391.57
ENTER enter (on the HP, puts the number on the stack)
Slide the correlation from negative to positive and watch the price gap change sign. On the second tab the futures payoff is a straight line while the FRA curves slightly away from it.
- Correlation with interest rates Memorize sets the sign of the gap
- Rate volatility and maturity Use it bigger moves and longer periods widen it
- Convexity bias in rate contracts Memorize FRA is discounted (curved); futures are linear
- Central clearing of OTC contracts Memorize futures-like margin narrows it
How does central clearing narrow the gap?
In central clearing, over-the-counter (OTC) dealers post margin or eligible collateral to a central counterparty, and they usually require the same from their clients. This margin for OTC derivatives gives forwards daily cash flows similar to futures. The gap in cash flow pattern, and so in price, becomes smaller. central clearing does not remove the need for liquidity: users of either contract must hold cash or eligible collateral ready for margin calls.
Go deeper Why bond and rate futures often show negative correlation with rates
A bond price falls when rates rise, so a bond future is negatively correlated with rates. By the rule above its forward price is slightly higher than its futures price. The effect is small but it is the usual direction for fixed-income underlyings.
Go deeper Stress and closeout
In a stress period a futures position is closed out if a margin call is missed, and the loss is crystallized. An OTC forward with flexible credit terms can stay open. Central clearing reduces this contrast, but the dealer’s own margin terms still apply to the client.
Memorize this
MemorizeThe correlation rule
| Futures price and rates | Which is higher | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Rates constant, or uncorrelated | equal | timing of cash does not matter |
| Positive correlation | futures price | gains reinvested at high rates, losses financed at low |
| Negative correlation | forward price | the opposite |
Memory hook The contract that is more attractive to the buyer has the higher price. Positive correlation = futures attractive.
Know it cold Convexity bias: FRA settlement is discounted at the new rate (curved); rate futures pay a fixed amount per bp (linear). It comes from the FRA, and grows with longer periods and more volatility. Central clearing makes OTC forwards futures-like.
- Prices equal Memorize no gap
- Interest rates constant reinvestment rate never changes
- Futures price uncorrelated with rates gains and losses meet rates at random
-
- Futures price higher Memorize positive correlation with rates
- Gains arrive when rates are high, reinvested well
- Losses arrive when rates are low, financed cheaply
-
- Forward price higher Memorize negative correlation with rates
- Gains arrive when rates are low, reinvested poorly
- Losses arrive when rates are high, financed dearly
-
- Correlation with interest rates Memorize sets the sign of the gap
- Rate volatility and maturity Use it bigger moves and longer periods widen it
- Convexity bias in rate contracts Memorize FRA is discounted (curved); futures are linear
- Central clearing of OTC contracts Memorize futures-like margin narrows it
Quick example
EUR 20 million, three-month period, rate up 60 bp to 3.60%. BPV = EUR 500, so the futures pay 60 × 500 = EUR 30,000, but the FRA settles at 30,000 ÷ (1 + 0.036 × 0.25) = EUR 29,732.41.
- 20000000×60×0.0001×0.25= 30000
- ÷(0.036×0.25+1)= 29732.41
- 20000000ENTER60×0.0001×0.25× 30000
- 0.036ENTER0.25×1+÷ 29732.41
ENTER enter (on the HP, puts the number on the stack)
How it is asked
-
Direction of the price gap
Futures prices are positively correlated with interest rates. Futures price versus forward price?
Futures higher. Trap: reversing the reinvestment logic.
-
When are prices equal
Under which condition are the prices identical?
Constant interest rates (or futures uncorrelated with rates). Trap: dividends or clearing.
-
Source of convexity bias
Why do FRA and rate futures settlements differ for the same rate move?
The FRA settlement is discounted (non-linear); the futures pay a fixed amount per bp.
-
Effect of central clearing
How does clearing change forward cash flows?
Dealers post margin to the CCP and pass it on, so forwards get futures-like cash flows and the gap narrows.
Exam traps
- Reversing the rule. Positive correlation with rates makes the futures price higher, not lower.
- Saying futures and forward prices are always the same. They are equal only with constant or uncorrelated rates.
- Blaming the futures contract for convexity bias. It comes from the FRA's discounting; the futures payoff is linear.
- Thinking the gap is large. For short maturities it is usually small.
- Believing central clearing removes margin costs. Users still need cash or eligible collateral for margin calls.
Checkpoint
6 exam-style questions. About 90 seconds each.
1If an asset's futures price is positively correlated with interest rates, compared with the forward price the futures price is most likely:
2Forward and futures prices on the same asset and date will be equal when:
3The convexity bias between interest rate futures and FRAs arises mainly because:
4A long FRA on USD 25 million covers a three-month period. The reference rate sets 40 basis points above the FRA rate, at 4.10%. The cash settlement at the start of the period is closest to:
5If futures prices are negatively correlated with interest rates, the price relationship between otherwise identical forward and futures contracts is most likely:
6Central clearing of OTC derivatives most likely makes forward contracts:
Key takeaways
- Forward and futures prices are equal if rates are constant or uncorrelated with the futures price.
- Positive correlation: futures price higher. Negative correlation: forward price higher.
- Convexity bias: FRA settlement is discounted and curved, rate futures are linear.
- Central clearing gives OTC contracts futures-like margin, which narrows the cash-flow and price gap.
Quick example
EUR 20 million, three-month period, rate up 60 bp to 3.60%. BPV = EUR 500, so the futures pay 60 × 500 = EUR 30,000, but the FRA settles at 30,000 ÷ (1 + 0.036 × 0.25) = EUR 29,732.41.
- 20000000×60×0.0001×0.25= 30000
- ÷(0.036×0.25+1)= 29732.41
- 20000000ENTER60×0.0001×0.25× 30000
- 0.036ENTER0.25×1+÷ 29732.41
ENTER enter (on the HP, puts the number on the stack)
All Derivatives formulas, every lesson
Practice exam-style questions on Pricing and Valuing Futures Contracts
Questions about this lesson?
Where this comes back
- Pricing and Valuing Interest Rate Swaps Derivatives
- Convexity and Portfolio Duration Fixed Income
- Introduction to Risk Management Portfolio Construction
Questions candidates ask
Why are futures prices different from forward prices?
Futures settle gains and losses daily, so the interest earned or paid on those flows affects the fair price. Forwards settle once at expiry. The prices are equal only if interest rates are constant or uncorrelated with the futures price, and the gap is usually small for short maturities.
What is convexity bias in interest rate futures?
An FRA's settlement is discounted at the new rate, so its payoff is slightly curved in the rate. A rate futures contract pays a fixed amount per basis point, so its payoff is a straight line. The two settle differently for the same rate move, and the difference grows with longer periods and bigger rate moves.
How does correlation with interest rates affect futures prices?
If futures prices rise when rates rise, a long reinvests gains at high rates and finances losses at low rates, so futures beat forwards and the futures price is higher. If the correlation is negative the reverse holds and the forward price is higher.
Spotted an error? Tell us and we will fix it.