You are reading the 2026 curriculum (exams up to November 2026). Sitting in February 2027 or later? Go to the 2027 Equities guide.
Intrinsic value vs price, and the three families of valuation models
Compare your estimate of intrinsic value with the market price: higher value means undervalued, lower means overvalued. Act only if the gap is larger than your uncertainty and you expect price to converge. Value estimates come from present value models, multiplier models or asset-based models, each with strengths and weaknesses.
Before this: Time Value of Money in Finance, Overview of Equity Securities, Company Analysis: Forecasting
On the exam
- Evaluate whether a security, given its current market price and a
- Value estimate, is overvalued, fairly valued, or undervalued by the market
- Describe major categories of equity valuation models
- Explain advantages and disadvantages of each category of valuation model
Evaluate whether a security is overvalued, fairly valued or undervalued; describe the categories of valuation model; explain their advantages and disadvantages. Expect: the verdict from a value and a price, which family a described method belongs to, and which family suits which company.
How deeply to learn each part
- Know the idea
- Understand it in general. It frames other topics, but you will not calculate with it.
- Use it
- Understand it well enough to solve a question with it. Recognize when it applies.
- Memorize
- Learn it by heart. The exam will not give it to you.
You know this one. The full lesson is folded away. The takeaways, formulas and checkpoint below are your quick refresher, and the checkpoint is a fair test of whether you still do.
You tested strong here. The full lesson is folded away. The takeaways, formulas and checkpoint below are your quick refresher, and the checkpoint is a fair test of whether you still know it.
How do you decide whether a share is cheap or expensive?
Estimate what the share is worth, then compare that estimate with what it costs. Intrinsic value is the value of a share based on an analysis of the company’s fundamentals, which is why it is also called fundamental value. The market price is what the share trades for now. By estimating a value at all, the analyst is saying the market price is not necessarily the best estimate of worth.
The comparison gives one of three verdicts.
- Undervalued Memorize V above P; a candidate to buy
- Fairly valued Memorize V equals P, or P sits inside your error band
- Overvalued Memorize V below P; avoid, sell or short
If the value estimate is above the price, the share is undervalued : you would pay less than it is worth. If the estimate is below the price, it is overvalued . If the two are equal, or the price is close enough to the estimate that the gap sits inside your uncertainty, it is fairly valued .
An analyst estimates a share's intrinsic value at 54.00. The share trades at 47.50. The gap between value and price, as a percentage of price, is closest to:
54.00 ÷ 47.50 − 1 = 13.68%
Value gap (upside), positive means undervalued13.68%
- 54÷47.5−1=0.136842, so 13.68%
- 54ENTER47.5÷1−0.136842
ENTER enter (on the HP, puts the number on the stack)
Try this 0 of 3
- Move the price inside the band
- With the worked example's prices, widen the band until you would no longer act
- Open all three model families
The price is below the whole band, so the share looks undervalued even allowing for your error. Act only if you also expect the price to move toward value within your horizon.
Show working
Gap = (54.00 − 47.50) ÷ 47.50 = 6.5 ÷ 47.50 = 13.68% (upside)
Band = 54.00 × (1 ± 0.08) = 49.68 to 58.32. The price 47.50 is below it.
- 54−47.5=÷47.5=0.136842, a gap of 13.68% of the price
- 54×0.92=lower edge 49.68
- 54×1.08=upper edge 58.32
- 54ENTER47.5−47.5÷0.136842, a gap of 13.68% of the price
- 54ENTER0.92×lower edge 49.68
- 54ENTER1.08×upper edge 58.32
ENTER enter (on the HP, puts the number on the stack)
Two judgments before you act
A value estimate is a range, not a point. Two questions decide whether the verdict is worth acting on.
- How confident are you in the model and its inputs? A gap of 0.5% is noise. Analysts often run several models and a range of inputs. If the price falls inside that range, the share is fairly valued, even if your central estimate is a little higher or lower. If it falls outside the whole range, the verdict is much stronger. A range of CHF 58 to 66 against a price of CHF 71 points to an overvalued share even on your most generous inputs.
- How confident are you that price will move to value within your horizon? An undervalued share pays off only if the market comes to agree with you.
Respect the market too. If nearly everything you analyze looks overvalued, or nearly everything looks undervalued, recheck your model before you recommend anything. Mispricing is more plausible in shares that few analysts follow than in widely covered ones.
Exam tip A gap inside your error band is “fairly valued”. Do not call it cheap or dear just because the sign is positive or negative.
What are the three families of valuation models?
Models that estimate intrinsic value fall into three families. They differ in what they treat as the source of a share’s worth.
- Present value (discounted cash flow) Use it PV of cash flows to shareholders
- Dividend discount model cash flow is dividends
- Free-cash-flow-to-equity model cash flow is dividend-paying capacity
-
- Multiplier (market multiple) Use it a multiple of a fundamental
- Price multiples P/E, P/B, P/S, P/CF
- Enterprise value multiples EV/EBITDA, EV/sales
-
- Asset-based Use it fair value of assets minus liabilities
Present value models value a share as the present value of the cash it is expected to deliver to shareholders. They are also called discounted cash flow models . The cash flow is either dividends (dividend discount models) or the cash left for shareholders after the company’s reinvestment and debt flows (free-cash-flow-to-equity models). The next three lessons build them.
Multiplier models , also called market multiple models , value a share by applying a multiple to a fundamental such as earnings, sales, cash flow or book value. A price multiple (P/E, P/S) goes straight to a price. An enterprise value multiple (EV/EBITDA, where EBITDA is earnings before interest, taxes, depreciation, and amortization) goes first to the value of the whole business, and the claims of lenders and preferred holders are then subtracted to reach equity.
Asset-based valuation models value a share as the estimated fair value of the company’s assets minus the fair value of its liabilities and preferred shares. Fair value usually starts from the balance sheet’s carrying value (also called book value) and is adjusted toward market value.
| Family | Values the share as | Examples | Advantages | Disadvantages |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Present value | PV of expected cash flows to shareholders | dividend discount model, free-cash-flow-to-equity model | grounded in theory; forces explicit assumptions | very sensitive to the required return and growth; long forecasts needed |
| Multiplier | a multiple of a fundamental | P/E, P/B, P/S, P/CF, EV/EBITDA | widely used; easy to compute and compare; reflects market views | relative only, so a whole sector can be mispriced; accounting differences; trailing multiples ignore the future; negative earnings |
| Asset-based | fair value of assets minus liabilities | adjusted book value, replacement cost | suits firms with mostly tradable or marked-to-market assets, and liquidations | hard for intangibles and specialized assets; poor for going concerns with large intangibles; inflation distorts values |
The choice depends on what information you have and how far you trust it. An analyst valuing a company with one year of history has little basis for a long cash flow forecast, but its young assets probably sit close to market value and industry multiples are available. That analyst would lean on the multiplier and asset-based estimates and trust the present value estimate least. Using all three and comparing them is a cross-check, often called triangulation.
Go deeper Why analysts still look at the market price
A model that returns a value far from the price is not automatically right. The price is the combined judgment of many investors, so a big gap is a prompt to ask what the market sees that the model does not. Sometimes the answer is a better input. Sometimes the answer is that the market is wrong, and that is the opportunity. Either way, the price works as a sanity check on the model, not as the answer.
Go deeper A correct estimate can still lose money
Suppose your value estimate is exactly right, yet the price stays below it for three years. If your horizon is one year, you take the loss of waiting. Convergence risk is why the verdict needs a second judgment. It is also why fundamental analysts care about catalysts such as earnings releases or a change in the capital return policy.
Go deeper Technical vs fundamental analysis, top-down vs bottom-up
Technical analysts use prices and trading volume to predict price moves. Fundamental analysts estimate value from information about the economy, the industry and the company, and compare it with the price. A top-down approach starts with the economy, picks promising sectors and then picks companies. A bottom-up approach starts with a few industries and forecasts company fundamentals one at a time. Valuation matters most in active management, which tries to beat a benchmark by finding mispriced shares.
Memorize this
MemorizeThe verdict rule
| Estimate vs price | Verdict | Action |
|---|---|---|
| V > P | undervalued | buy candidate |
| V = P (or P inside the error band) | fairly valued | no action |
| V < P | overvalued | avoid or sell |
Memory hook Value is what you get, price is what you pay. If you get more than you pay, it is cheap.
Know it cold Act only when the gap beats your model uncertainty AND price is expected to converge to value in your horizon.
MemorizeWhich family fits which company
| Family | Best fit | Main weakness |
|---|---|---|
| Present value | mature dividend payer; stable, forecastable cash flows | very sensitive to r and g; needs long forecasts |
| Multiplier | company with listed, similar peers | relative only; accounting differences; negative earnings |
| Asset-based | bank, investment holding firm, liquidation, private firm with few intangibles | intangibles and specialized assets are hard to value |
Memory hook Cash flows, peers, or assets: ask which of the three you can measure most reliably for this company.
Know it cold A multiple tells you cheap or dear compared with peers, never cheap or dear in absolute terms.
- Undervalued Memorize V above P; a candidate to buy
- Fairly valued Memorize V equals P, or P sits inside your error band
- Overvalued Memorize V below P; avoid, sell or short
- Present value (discounted cash flow) Use it PV of cash flows to shareholders
- Dividend discount model cash flow is dividends
- Free-cash-flow-to-equity model cash flow is dividend-paying capacity
-
- Multiplier (market multiple) Use it a multiple of a fundamental
- Price multiples P/E, P/B, P/S, P/CF
- Enterprise value multiples EV/EBITDA, EV/sales
-
- Asset-based Use it fair value of assets minus liabilities
Quick example
An analyst values a share at 30.00 and it trades at 33.60. 30.00 ÷ 33.60 − 1 = −10.71%, so the share looks overvalued.
- 30÷33.6−1= −0.1071
- 30ENTER33.6÷1− −0.1071
ENTER enter (on the HP, puts the number on the stack)
How it is asked
-
Value and price given
Estimated value 30.00, market price 33.60. Conclusion?
V < P: overvalued. Trap: reversing the rule.
-
Range against price
Several models give CHF 58 to 66. The price is CHF 71. Verdict?
Price above the whole range: overvalued. Inside the range would be fairly valued.
-
Name the family
Value = 9 × EBITDA, then add cash and subtract debt.
Multiplier model (enterprise value multiple).
-
Best fit
Which firm suits an asset-based model?
Investment holding company whose assets are listed securities; not software or pre-revenue biotech.
Exam traps
- Reversing the rule. Value above price means undervalued, not overvalued.
- Acting on a gap inside the model's margin of error. A value of 100.50 against a price of 100.00 is fairly valued.
- Treating multiplier models as absolute valuation. They are relative: the whole peer group could be mispriced.
- Using an asset-based model for a firm whose value sits in intangibles such as software, brands or customer relationships.
Checkpoint
5 exam-style questions. About 90 seconds each.
1An analyst estimates a share's intrinsic value at USD 30.00. It trades at USD 33.60. The share is most likely:
2Valuing a company at 9 times its EBITDA, then adding its cash and subtracting its debt to reach a value for the shares, is an example of a:
3An asset-based valuation model is most appropriate for:
4An analyst is confident that her value estimate for a share is well above its market price, and the gap is far wider than her model's margin of error. Before she recommends buying, she should most need to be confident that:
5Compared with multiplier models, present value models are most likely to be criticized for their:
Key takeaways
- Value above price: undervalued. Value below price: overvalued.
- Act only when the gap exceeds your uncertainty and you expect convergence.
- Present value, multiplier and asset-based models each fit different companies.
- If almost everything looks overvalued, suspect your model before you suspect the market.
Quick example
An analyst values a share at 30.00 and it trades at 33.60. 30.00 ÷ 33.60 − 1 = −10.71%, so the share looks overvalued.
- 30÷33.6−1= −0.1071
- 30ENTER33.6÷1− −0.1071
ENTER enter (on the HP, puts the number on the stack)
Questions about this lesson?
Where this comes back
- Dividends, stock splits and share repurchases Equity Valuation: Concepts and Basic Tools
- Portfolio Risk and Return: Part II (CAPM and Performance Measures) Portfolio Construction
Questions candidates ask
How do you know if a stock is undervalued in CFA Level 1?
Compare your estimate of intrinsic value with the market price. If the estimate is higher, the stock appears undervalued, provided the gap is larger than your model's uncertainty.
What are the three categories of equity valuation models?
Present value (discounted cash flow) models, multiplier (market multiple) models and asset-based models.
What are the disadvantages of multiplier models?
They value relative to other shares, so a whole sector can be mispriced. They are also affected by accounting differences and break down with negative earnings.
Spotted an error? Tell us and we will fix it.